![]() ![]() For instance, on one of the pages showing men in formal clothing in the 1920s we have a photograph of an actor dressed in a top hat, black jacket, grey waistcoat and checked trousers. My main complaint - and reason why this book does not get the five stars it otherwise would - is that the text, at times, rather lets down the quality of the illustrations. There is also a distinct weighting toward female fashion menswear isn't ignored but doesn't receive the same attention as the pretty frocks. Perhaps this is unsurprising and, given the span of time that the book has to cover, not necessarily a bad thing. The concentration is very much on European and western clothing. ![]() These are informative and illustrate the changing costumes very well. Contemporary illustrations and photographs are complimented by more detailed modern photographic studies of particular pieces. ![]() The range of illustrations is astonishing. And a fascinating glimpse into the clothing of the past it is.ĭorling Kindersley have one again provided a stunning looking reference book. The subtitle 'The Ultimate Book of Costume and Style' is a better fit. 'Fashion' is a slightly misleading title for this history of clothing and costume. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |